Connect with us

Editorial

The Evolution of Disco: Did Disco Die or Has it Always Stayed Alive?

Unknown's avatar

Published

on

Originating in the early 1970’s Disco emerged as more than just a music genre but as a lifestyle and a symbol for groups who were traditionally marginalized. Although there is no consensus on the birthplace of Disco, we can all agree that disco has made its mark on the world and more specifically on Electronic music as we know it today.

In this deep dive we’re taking you on a journey from Disco’s roots to the present with some conversations of some of the heavy hitters in the scene today. Interviews with Dr Packer, Dave Lee, and Rikky Disco with their insight to the scene and its evolution are included throughout the article. These three artists are leading the charge in keeping Disco alive across the globe and it was a honor to have their contributions to this article.

Okay now with all that being said, let’s turn back the clock to the 1970’s:

The Birth of Disco (Early 1970’s)

Taking it from the very top, the word Disco derives from the French word discotheque (dance club) which came into the general vernacular in the 1960’s. Disco had its early beginnings in underground clubs in New York, Germany, France, that were popular among predominantly black, LGBT, and Latino dancers. At these clubs DJs would spin extended play single records. It was at this time where DJs became stars rather than being background music. The center and focus around DJs as we know it today started from the Disco movement.

In the 1970’s, Disco emerged as a counterculture to the social norms of the times. It was during this time that civil rights, women’s liberation and LGBT rights were gaining momentum. It was in this context that Disco gave a voice to those who in the past were not able to speak their truth. Disco allowed for people from all walks of life to come together for the love of the music, similar to raves and festivals as we know it today. Think of how many people you’ve met from all over the world during festival season with different backgrounds and experiences than you. Disco is what started it all.

How would you describe the evolution of disco music from its origins to the present day?

Dave Lee: Disco has survived much longer than I think anyone would have predicted. I was 15 in 1979 and the attitude in most press and on the radio was that it was throwaway music which wouldn’t stand the test of time. One of the reasons it has had such a massive resurgence is technology based, meaning it’s been sampled and regurgitated since the beginnings of house music. From the late 80s onwards it’s been largely DJs who are making dance records, they often can’t write songs, so instead like to remix, sample and remake their favourite old records. The development of samplers has made producing new music based on old records much easier and cheaper.

Also, Disco is the party music of now. Back when I was a kid Motown was the old music that was played at weddings and many clubs that got everyone singing along on the dancefloor. Today it’s the big Disco hits that perform that roll. The reason being the big Disco hits are both memorable and catchy, whilst sonically they still sound great. Even many of the Rock guys I know who hated Disco back in the day now appreciate how well-crafted and performed those records were.

Rikky Disco: The evolution of Disco music spans several decades and has undergone various transformations since its origins in the 1970s. During the 80s, Disco experienced a decline in mainstream popularity, its influence persisted in underground dance scenes. Electronic dance music (EDM) began to incorporate disco elements, with artists using synthesizers and drum machines to create a new sound. Throughout the years Disco has diversified itself into various subgenres, including Eurodisco, Hi-NRG, and Italo-Disco. Meanwhile other genres as Hip-Hop and Pop been sampling classic Disco tracks into their productions.

Disco Fever (mid to late 1970’s)

In the mid-1970’s Disco transcended from beyond the clubs and onto the radio. Looking for example at the US Top 40 in 1976, the top artists were all disco. It was during this time that Donna Summer rose to fame and left her mark on the scene with hits such as ‘Love to Love You Baby’, ‘Last Dance’, and ‘Hot Stuff’.

Another notable artist from this time period was Gloria Gaynor, best known for ‘I Will Survive’ and ‘Let Me Know’, these Disco Queens were household names in the scene and continue to live on through remixes that we hear today both on the radio and at raves and festivals.

As Disco became more and more popular on the radio, its popularity in nightclubs was no different. In 1977, the legendary Studio 54 opened its doors on 54th Street in New York City. Studio 54 would come to be the home of infamous parties featuring celebrities, live animals, and some scandalous moments (I’m still waiting for my dad to tell me what actually happened there!).

That same year, the film Saturday Night Fever, catapulted Disco even further into the mainstream. The soundtrack of the movie by the Bee Gees included ‘Stayin’ Alive’ and ‘Night Fever’ which became synonymous with the Disco era. The movie featuring John Travolta told the story of a young Italian-American who dances the weekends away at a local Disco to escape the troubles in his personal life. Saturday Night Fever also showcased the flashy and over-the-top style of dress that went hand in hand with Disco music.

Who, in your opinion, are the most influential artists in the history of disco, and what makes their contributions significant?

Dr. Packer: For me personally producers such as ‘Giorgio Moroder, Patrick Adams & Rod Temperton’ get my vote as they were behind some of the biggest tracks from that era such as ‘Donna Summer – I Feel Love’ which some even suggest that started off Techno music.

Dave Lee: Most Disco was studio music, it was led by the producer and writers. Usually, the singers and artists we saw perform on TV weren’t actually making the songs. in many cases they were hired to front the act if the record looked like it had crossover appeal. It’s one of many things that annoyed the Rock press, as it made the whole genre deposable to them. In their view Disco represented the opposite of a “proper artist” like Bob Dylan who was a singer song writer and has something to say with his lyrics. Disco wasn’t about political lyrics, the vocals are often use like another instrument and the message is about love, dancing or having fun – which journalists (who are words smiths themselves) didn’t respect. Of course, they were exceptions such as Sylvester but not that many. So, if I was going to name the most influential artists I would list the producers who actually made those iconic records – Bernard Edwards & Nile Rogers, Kenny Gamble & Leon Huff, Georgio Moroder & Pete Bellote, Cerrone, Patrick Adams, Rinder & Lewis, Freddie Peren, Leon Sylvers, Baker Harris Young, Patrick Cowley, Randy Muller. Even the Bee Gees, yes it was Pop Disco but amazing songs that took things mainstream and made disco bigger than it would have been without them.

Rikky Disco: The start of Giorgo Moroder & Donna Summer collaboration with the songs “I Feel Love”. Partly because it was totally revolutionary to use a synthesizer and drum machine to program the music in that way and in combination with Donna summer´s striking voice and Song melody and lyrics it took us listeners to a place we´ve never experienced before.

Disco Demolition Night (1979)

As fun as of this sounds and, side note I often wonder what I would have worn at Studio 54, it sounds wild, there was dark side to all of this. A backlash went into full force in the late 1970’s against Disco and everything that it stood for. On July 12, 1979, Disco Demolition Night was a baseball promotion event at Comiskey Park in Chicago, Illinois that spiraled into a riot. Chicago’s baseball team, the White Sox were having a rough season, so in order to boost ticket sales, admission was discounted for attendees who turned in a Disco record. In between the games that night, anti-Disco pundit Steve Dahl destroyed all the records that were turned in. At one point in the evening a crate filled with records was blown up on the field. The stadium was so damaged that the White Sox had to forfeit the second game.

Disco Today (1980’s – Present)

Although Disco experienced a decline in the mainstream, its influence, and legacy lives on all over the world. The turn of the century saw a resurgence of interest in Disco which became what we know today as Nu-Disco. The sound of Disco has also been reimagined and sampled through modern day Electronic Dance Music and is still often played on the radio or during Disco throwback nights.

There’s a perception that disco “died” at a certain point. What are your thoughts on this, and do you agree with that characterization?

Dr. Packer: Well this was well before my time (late 70s) I was born in 1972 so I can only go on what I’ve read from researching , I just heard stories of American rock fans destroying disco records around 1979 , also it was no longer about the ‘Love’ but more about the ‘Love of money’ due to record companies getting greedy , whether this is true or not will remain a mystery to me , all I know is that it’s great music and I love the balance of delivering it in a new way to today’s dancefloors.

Dave Lee: Disco died more in America than here in Europe. Disco was never a dirty word in the UK (unless you hated it all along) and the music never really stopped being played. However, in the USA there was a proper backlash with many labels and radio stations quick to drop it and distance themselves from disco, this was partly masterminded by the rock community who hated and felt threatened by disco. I recall when visiting the USA in the late 80s some people would raise an eyebrow if you talked about disco positively. However, I would add that it’s easy to get a little misty eyed about disco now, there was a lot of rubbish released in the mid/late 70s, often produced purely with the aim of making a quick buck, be it disco cover versions of old show tunes or TV celebrities/cartoon characters making a disco record. Disco was a craze, and those crap gimmicky records often got more exposure than the better stuff.

Rikky Disco: After spending many hours listening to classic disco from the early days up until today it would be more accurate to view it as a transformative phase rather than a complete death.

DJs and producers continued to incorporate disco elements into their mixes, and the genre experienced a revival in various forms in the 1980s and beyond. The genre has demonstrated resilience and adaptability, leaving a lasting legacy that continues to influence music and culture across genres and generations.

Conclusion

From the early days to underground clubs to taking over the mainstream, Disco has undergone an incredible evolution. Disco has proven itself time and time again that it is more than a genre of music but a movement, similar to electronic music today it’s more than just a night out it’s a lifestyle. In conclusion, it’s clear that Disco never died, and that Disco is here to stay!

Editorial

Live Nation and Ticketmaster Ruled an Illegal Monopoly — Now What?

Unknown's avatar

Published

on

For years, hating Ticketmaster has felt less like an opinion and more like a personality trait for live music fans around the world. Now, a jury just backed it up.

On April 15, 2026, a federal jury in New York ruled that Live Nation Entertainment, the parent company of Ticketmaster, illegally monopolized the live events and ticketing industry.

The takeaway: the system isn’t just frustrating — it’s been ruled anti-competitive.

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by The New York Times (@nytimes)

What the ruling actually does

The jury found that Live Nation violated antitrust laws by controlling multiple parts of the live event pipeline at once — including promotion, venues, and ticketing.

But this isn’t the final outcome.

The jury decided liability. The court still has to decide what happens next.

So… what happens now?

Nothing changes overnight.

The case now moves into the remedies phase, where the court will determine penalties and potential structural changes.

That could include:

  • significant financial damages
  • restrictions on how Live Nation operates
  • or, in a more extreme scenario, a forced separation from Ticketmaster

That last option is possible, but not guaranteed.

Live Nation has already said it plans to appeal, which means this could take years to fully play out. In the meantime, the current system stays exactly as it is.

Why this matters for dance music

This isn’t just about ticketing — it’s about the infrastructure behind electronic music.

Live Nation Entertainment has spent the last decade embedding itself directly into the dance music ecosystem through partnerships, acquisitions, and ownership stakes.

In 2013, the company entered a partnership with Insomniac Events — widely reported at the time to include roughly a 50% stake for around $50 million. Insomniac, the force behind Electric Daisy Carnival and other major festivals across the globe, remained creatively independent — but financially tied into Live Nation’s ecosystem.

That relationship still defines a huge portion of the U.S. electronic festival landscape today.

Live Nation has also made direct acquisitions in the space. It acquired Cream Holdings, the company behind Creamfields, adding one of Europe’s biggest electronic festivals to its portfolio.

And that’s just one piece of a much larger strategy.

The bottom line

This isn’t the moment ticket prices suddenly drop — it’s the moment the system gets called out and backed by a legal ruling. For the first time, the frustrations around ticketing aren’t just noise from fans. They’ve been validated in court.

Now the question isn’t whether the system is broken. It’s what happens if it’s actually forced to change.

Continue Reading

Coachella Festival News

Spotify Data Reveals 2010s EDM Dominates Coachella 2026 Playlists

Unknown's avatar

Published

on

Crowd at Coachella festival grounds with main stage and ferris wheel as Spotify data shows 2010s EDM tracks trending in 2026 playlists

Spotify Data Reveals 2010s EDM Dominates Coachella 2026 Playlists, with tracks like “Clarity” and “Lean On” leading fan-curated selections

Spotify’s latest data, based on more than 340,000 user-generated Coachella playlists ahead of the 2026 festival, shows how listeners are preparing for the weekend in a way that goes beyond the current lineup. Instead of focusing only on artists set to play this year, fans are adding tracks that were central to the festival’s earlier years, especially from the early and mid-2010s. Songs like Latch by Disclosure and Sam Smith, Lean On by Major Lazer, , and DJ Snake, Clarity by Zedd and Foxes, and Drop The Game by Flume and Chet Faker appear consistently across these playlists. Even without most of these names appearing on the 2026 lineup, their music is still part of how people are getting into the festival mindset, linking the current edition back to a period many still associate with Coachella’s peak years.

The 2010s Tracks Fans Still Add to Coachella Playlists Before the Festival

Looking at the songs turning up most often in these Coachella playlists ahead of 2026, the pattern points back to a short but important period from 2012 to 2015, when electronic music stopped being limited to club crowds and started reaching a much wider audience. Latch by Disclosure and Sam Smith dropped in 2012 and took time to grow, first breaking through in the UK before later becoming a sleeper hit in the United States. That longer climb matters here. It was not a song that flashed and disappeared after one season. It stayed in people’s playlists, on radio, and in DJ selections long enough to become attached to that era in a lasting way. Billboard later described it as Disclosure’s breakthrough single, which helps explain why it still shows up when listeners put together festival playlists now.

@coachella 2016 ➡️ 2026 @Disclosure ♬ original sound – coachella

Clarity by Zedd and Foxes, also released in 2012, played a different role in that period because it reached both pop audiences and dance audiences at the same time. It was not just a festival favorite. It also won Best Dance Recording at the 56th GRAMMY Awards, which gave it a level of recognition few EDM tracks from that period received in the mainstream. Then in 2015, Lean On by Major Lazer, , and DJ Snake pushed that crossover even further. By November that year, Billboard reported that it had become Spotify’s most-streamed song of all time, showing how strongly it connected across streaming, radio, and festival culture all at once. When listeners add those records to Coachella playlists now, they are not pulling from a random nostalgia pile. They are picking songs that marked major turning points in how electronic music reached the public.

@zedd Let’s do it again @coachella ♬ Clarity – Zedd

Drop The Game by Flume and Chet Faker, released on November 18, 2013, adds another side of that story. Unlike Clarity or Lean On, it was not driven by the same global pop exposure, but it still became one of the defining electronic releases to come out of Australia during that period. It reached No. 18 on the ARIA Singles Chart, went Platinum in Australia, and placed at No. 5 in Triple J’s Hottest 100 of 2013. That matters because it shows this playlist trend is not only about the biggest crossover hits. Listeners are also going back to records that carried a different mood and reflected how broad the scene had become by the middle of the decade. Put together, these four tracks map out a period when electronic music was expanding in several directions at once, which is exactly why they still make sense in Coachella 2026 playlists now.

Fans Mix 2010s EDM with Current Headliners in Coachella Playlists

Looking beyond the track selections, the artist data from Spotify shows how listeners are placing different eras of Coachella side by side in the same playlists ahead of 2026. Alongside songs like Clarity or Lean On, the most added names include Lana Del Rey, Lady Gaga, The Weeknd, Frank Ocean, and Billie Eilish, artists who have held headline or closing positions at the festival in recent years. Their presence next to early 2010s EDM records is not accidental. It reflects how listeners combine tracks from an earlier EDM-focused period with artists who now represent the current direction of Coachella.

That combination links back to how the festival itself has shifted over time. During the early 2010s, electronic acts such as Calvin Harris, Swedish House Mafia, and Avicii were regularly scheduled in major evening slots, with tracks like Clarity or Lean On appearing across multiple sets in the same weekend. In more recent editions, those same time slots are more often occupied by artists like The Weeknd or Billie Eilish, whose performances draw different audiences and change how the night unfolds across stages. When listeners include these artists in the same playlist, they are not separating past and present, they are arranging them in a way that reflects how they understand the festival across different years.

The way listeners approach these playlists ahead of Coachella 2026 also reflects how preparation for the festival now extends beyond simply following a lineup. With Spotify’s collaborative playlists, groups attending together can add tracks into a shared list before the weekend, which often leads to a mix that includes both 2010s EDM and current artists without one replacing the other. At the same time, prompt-based playlists give users a starting point tied directly to the lineup, using requests such as creating a playlist focused on artists they already follow alongside new names they plan to see. These features do not determine what listeners choose, but they make it easier to combine past listening habits with current plans, which helps explain why tracks like Clarity or Lean On continue to appear alongside artists performing at Coachella today.

This pattern across Spotify playlists ahead of Coachella 2026 points to something more specific than nostalgia. The continued presence of 2010s EDM is tied to how listeners remember the festival at a time when electronic music held a central role across major stages, while the inclusion of current headliners reflects how the event has expanded in recent years. When both appear in the same playlist, it is not a contrast for the sake of it, it is a way of bringing those two periods into one listening experience. As fans prepare for Coachella, these playlists become less about following a lineup and more about reconnecting with the tracks and artists they associate with the festival, which explains why songs from the 2010s continue to sit alongside today’s biggest names.

Continue Reading

Editorial

The Psychology Behind Why Music Feels So Personal

Unknown's avatar

Published

on

People embracing in a group at a music festival, reflecting deep emotional connection to music and shared experience

The Psychology Behind Why Music Feels So Personal explained through how listeners process emotion, empathy, and sensory experience

Psychological research suggests that deep emotional connection to music is closely linked to how people process emotion, empathy, and sensory experience.. A widely cited study published in PLOS ONE found that individuals with higher levels of empathy tend to develop stronger emotional connections with music, independent of broader personality traits. The research moves beyond genre and focuses on how listeners engage with sound, mood, and emotional nuance. In music cultures where progression, structure, and immersion play a central role, such as electronic music, this helps explain why some listeners experience music as something deeply felt, not just heard.

How Deep Emotional Connection Plays Out in Electronic Music

Research linking empathy and emotional processing to music engagement helps explain why certain electronic music experiences resonate more strongly with some listeners. In electronic music, emotional connection often forms over extended moments, not through instant hooks. For example, long progressive sets by artists such as Eric Prydz, Matisse & Sadko, or Lane 8 rely on gradual melodic development, repetition with variation, and delayed resolution that unfolds across time. Listeners who connect deeply to these sets often describe being fully absorbed during build phases, subtle chord changes, or slow transitions, instead of reacting only to drops or climactic moments, with the experience building gradually as the set progresses.

This type of connection becomes especially visible at large-scale festivals and extended club environments, with electronic music festivals providing some of the clearest examples. At events like Tomorrowland, Anjunadeep Open Air, or Afterlife, audiences often stay engaged through long sequences of tracks that evolve over time, sometimes without vocals or obvious peaks. Instead of focusing on individual songs, listeners follow how the sound progresses across a full hour or multi-hour set. Research published in PLOS ONE supports this pattern, showing that individuals with higher empathy tend to process music through internal emotional response and sustained engagement. In electronic music settings, this leads to listeners forming strong emotional attachment to long-form sets, closing sequences, and extended transitions, where meaning builds gradually through sound over time.

Why Extended Sets Build Stronger Emotional Connection

Extended DJ sets create space for emotional connection by giving artists time to control pacing, repetition, and progression in ways shorter slots cannot match. DJs known for long-format performances such as Carl Cox at Club Space Miami, Solomun during open-to-close sets, or Sasha and John Digweed in extended club nights often introduce ideas early and carry them across hours, allowing patterns, melodies, and transitions to settle before shifting direction. In extended DJ sets, this progression becomes easier to follow over time, giving listeners a clearer sense of how the set is unfolding. Instead of reacting to isolated drops or individual tracks, listeners follow a continuous flow through sequencing, subtle tempo adjustments, and melodic progression that develops gradually across the set. As the set moves forward, earlier elements begin to reappear in different forms, transitions feel more deliberate, and listeners start to anticipate what comes next, which strengthens engagement and makes each change feel more meaningful in context.

This approach is also central to contemporary festival experiences. Tale Of Us at Afterlife showcases, Black Coffee during extended festival closings, and Eric Prydz in long-form headline slots are known for sets where emotional impact comes from progression and timing, not constant intensity. In these performances, a track played later in the set often carries more emotional weight because of what came before it. For listeners who connect deeply with music, extended sets allow emotional attachment to build through familiarity, anticipation, and resolution across time. The experience feels continuous, with each moment linked to the next, which explains why many EDM fans describe certain nights, sunrise closings, or multi-hour sets as personally meaningful, not just entertaining.

Deep Emotional Connection Across the Electronic Music Scene Today

Deep emotional connection in electronic music often comes down to time, flow, and how sound is experienced across a full set, not in isolated moments. Extended performances allow listeners to settle into patterns, notice subtle shifts, and attach meaning to how a night unfolds from start to finish. This is why many EDM fans remember specific sunrise closings, long club nights, or festival sets as complete experiences, not just collections of tracks. The connection forms through continuity and attention, making electronic music something that lingers well beyond the final record.

As lineups continue to include more extended sets and open-to-close formats, this way of experiencing music is becoming more visible across the scene. Listeners are spending more time following full sets instead of individual tracks, whether at festivals, clubs, or through recorded live sets online. That shift points toward a deeper kind of engagement, where the focus is not only on what is played, but how it unfolds over time. For artists and audiences alike, it leaves more room for connection to build naturally, giving each set a sense of progression that stays with listeners long after it ends.

Continue Reading

Trending